Election Day 2020 is less than 60 days away. In a year like no other, we’ve seen a pandemic, forced economic closures, changes to traditional schooling, canceled events and political discourse as high as ever. Voter turnout is sure to be record-breaking.

This year’s election will be mostly administered through the mail and ballots will be sent on October 13. Lehi voters will receive a lengthy ballot including choices for the United States Presidency, the US House of Representatives, Utah House of Representatives, Utah County Commissioner and more.

One of the most hotly contested ballot items this year is Utah County Prop 9. The ballot initiative added to the ballot by County Commissioners Tanner Ainge and recently ousted Nathan Ivie, would bring major change to the government structure of Utah County.

If the proposition passes, the Utah County Commission would move from its current full-time at-large three commissioner structure, which oversees both executive and legislative responsibilities and convert it to a mayor and council system. The new structure would include a full-time mayor and five part-time council members to represent geographic districts in Utah County, along with a full-time deputy mayor and full-time council assistant.

The proposed change is marketed as having an overall budget savings of 34% as the council members’ part-time salary would be $20,000 each and ineligible for benefits. The proposed mayor’s salary would be $120,000 annually with $47,000 in additional value for benefits. The deputy mayor would receive a salary of $80,000 with $31,200 in benefits. The new assistant to the council role would receive a salary of $65,000 with $23,350 in benefits.

Currently, the three commissioners each receive a full-time salary of $119,444 with $46,251 value in benefits. Each commissioner also has a full-time policy advisor, each making $74,000 annually with $33,148 in additional benefits contribution.

Although the change is being marketed by supporters as saving tax-payer money, many residents are concerned the numbers aren’t realistic and cite the ballooned government of Salt Lake County as an example. The Salt Lake County Mayor’s office has drastically increased its executive office size since 2013. Under former Mayor Ben McAdams, now congressman for Utah’s 4th Congressional District, the Deputy Mayor position increased from one person to four Deputy Mayors. Since McAdams’ departure, current Mayor Jenny Wilson has increased deputy mayor positions from four to six, with the highest-level position bringing in $276,000 a year including salary and benefits.

“Sell the benefits of the change of government and how it benefits Utah County as a whole but selling it as a cost-savings is like selling oceanfront property in Arizona. It speaks contrary to logic,” said Mapleton City Councilwoman, Leslie Jones.

Yes on Prop 9 supporters, led by Cedar Hills Mayor, Jenney Rees, who has been linked to a potential run for the county mayor role if passed, has also touted the proposition as a form of government that will provide better representation for the surging population of Utah County.

“Having served as a city elected official in Utah County for almost nine years, I have seen firsthand that our current form of county government doesn’t work well for a county of our size,” said Rees, who favors geographic district councilmembers, opposed to the current at-large system.

The proposed five council districts are broken up by region. District 1 mostly includes Lehi, Saratoga Springs and Eagle Mountain. District 2 would cover Alpine, Highland, Cedar Hills, American Fork and most of Pleasant Grove. District 3 would include Lindon, Vineyard, and Orem. District 4 would represent Provo and the North end of Springville. District 5 would encompass Springville, Mapleton, Spanish Fork, Salem, Payson, Woodland Hills, Elk Ridge, Genola and Santaquin.

Opponents argue that district representation leads to narrow focus and neglects the larger populous. They suggest that a councilor could tax the at-large county base and then lobby for funds in their district, ultimately taxing most people who don’t live in their represented district.

Opponents also argue that they prefer the three full-time Commissioners over part-time councilors, citing a lack of attention and or a heavy reliance on bureaucratic support staff in making legislative decisions.

Current County Commissioner and outspoken advocate for the change, Tanner Ainge, argues that the current structure gives just three people too much power and control over the County, especially given the history of contention and controversy that has plagued the Utah County Commission for many years.

“I support the change, and so do the vast majority of our local mayors, state legislators and many of our business leaders. Without the change, we continue with three full-time commissioners who operate both as a three-headed executive and a three-member legislative body. With the change, the executive power would go to an elected, full-time county executive, while the legislative power would go to a separate five-member legislative council,” said Ainge on a social media post in August.

Proposition opponents challenge the theory that power will be separated in a new system, as the mayor’s authority has the potential to be far-reaching, such as recently seen with Salt Lake County with Mayor Jenny Wilson signing emergency declarations and mask mandates.

In the proposed change, the mayor would have specific authorities, including veto power, but the Council would have the ability to override executive decisions.

“Consolidating more power in the hands of one person (in this case a mayor) will lead to the same issues seen with a strong mayor in Salt Lake County. Political power nearly always consolidates upward. It’s a natural trend. That’s not a good thing and will only trade one set of issues for another set of issues,” said Saratoga Springs resident, Taylor Williams.

Residents will experience advertising messages, discussions and social media interactions on this divided but non-partisan proposition now through election day, but the final word is ultimately up to Utah County voters on November 3.


  1. The issues/problems that Salt Lake County have are NOT a result of the system they are using. They are a reflection of the citizen’s choices in the elected officials. Cache County has the same system, without those problems. The reality is that Utah County has grown way beyond the size that a three member commission will work. I believe we will have worse problems, if we continue the way we are.

  2. Proposition 9 is not about improving government—it’s about expanding government on the backs of taxpayers. With the economy down and continued economic uncertainty under COVID-19, now is a terrible time to consider growing county government.

    Make no mistake: Voting in favor of Proposition 9 will lead to an expansion of government and an increase in your taxes over time. Twenty years ago, Salt Lake County switched to the mayor-council form of government, the result was more bureaucracy, bloated salaries for county officials, “celebrity mayors” seeking higher office, and continual tax increases.

    Even the formation of small towns or realignment of school districts requires an independent financial analysis, typically by a CPA firm. NONE was completed for this massive change in government and proponents are relying on the math of the same two County Commissioners who couldn’t even balance their budget and proposed a doubling of the property tax. No independent salary study, benefits study, staffing plan, office space analysis, or total costs analysis has been conducted on the financial impact of Proposition 9.

    We know one thing for sure by looking at Salt Lake County: expanding the county government will result in more government and more taxes. WE BELIEVE UTAH COUNTY RESIDENTS ARE TAXED ENOUGH. In recent years we have seen property tax increases, gas tax increases, and several sales tax increases from the state and many local taxing entities. And these tax increases aren’t cheap—they add up to thousands of dollars per household.

    Approving Proposition 9 will result in less representation, not more. Currently, all three Utah County commissioners are elected at-large, which means each voter is represented by 100% of the Commission and each voter votes for all three. Under Proposition 9, each voter would only vote on one of the five councilmembers, which means each voter would be represented by just 20% of the Council.

    Utah County already has tremendous separation of powers. In addition to the three commissioners, we have seven other independently elected county government officials. Increasing the number of elected officials is an unnecessary expansion of government.

    Another big problem with Proposition 9 is that it consolidates executive power into one person: a county mayor. Because Utah has no recall law, it is virtually impossible to mitigate a bad county mayor. Contrast that with the Commission form of government, where the negative impact of one bad executive is minimized by the other two commissioners.

    One of the advantages of the current system is having three full-time commissioners, empowering voters by giving direct electoral oversight over those making the day-to-day decisions in county government. But under Proposition 9, the bureaucracy will be empowered because the new legislative body would only serve part-time. Having three full-time commissioners provides much greater oversight than one full-time mayor and a part-time council.

    Jerry Grover, Former Utah County Commissioner

Comments are closed.